7 posts tagged “geeked”
I'm kind of lazy. I'm working on so muc at once, that my pet project (this) gets neglected, since it's only a pet, and shits in a box and licks itself clean, I think it doesn't ever really need me, but it does. Movie things.
The aforementioned Kick-Ass, based on the comic series, picks up more cast, as, according to Cinematical:
[...] they've cast the lead: it'll be 18 year-old Aaron Johnson, whom you may remember as little Ed Norton in The Illusionist. Joining him will be Nicolas Cage and TV vet Lyndsy Fonseca. Fonseca will play the love interest, while Cage will play the father of Elizabeth Rappe's future daughter, "a vicious, foul-mouthed 11-year-old who chops down criminals with a katana." Apparently he's trained her to do that as part of his quest to take down a druglord.
I've seen Matthew Vaughn's (the director's) Layer Cake, and it wasn't bad--it was stylish, and I hope he can make a half-decent superhero movie that isn't living in the Dark Knight's shadow. This is a pretty low-profile character, so he should be aight.Next!
Another movie that I have on notice (I'll drizzle in info on some more of them as time goes on) is Inglorious Bastards. In the last few weeks, casting rumors have had actors coming and going--at one point Simon Pegg, soon to be of Star Trek fame, was attached, but he's apparently out. Here's what IMDB is offically saying the cast looks like, as of today:
Cast
| Brad Pitt | ... | Aldo Raine | |
| Mike Myers | ... | General Ed Fenech | |
| Eli Roth | ... | Sgt. Donnie Donowitz | |
| B.J. Novak | ... | PFC Utivich | |
| Samm Levine | |||
| Nastassja Kinski | ... | Bridget Von Hammersmark (rumored) |
Gotta love that 'rumored'. Why even include it? Also, the character names don't matter as much as the fact that someone is agreeing to be a part of it, which is the good news.
Finally--Harry Potter has been moved back to too far to be worried about right now, but here's a link to some pictures from the film/set, like it helps or something.
Shit yeah!...These eleven months are fuckin flying by, bro!
Lastly (more definite than 'finally'), people have seen Guy Ritchie's Rocknrolla, and they don't hate it, so that's a positive.

Hard Candy basically sucked anyway, amiright?
I'm one of those people who likes Star Trek, only notable because I'm the only one of my friends who does, and I'm looking forward to the new one, out on May the 9th of 2009. I like the aspect of an immersive world that it offers--it feels lived in (though I never got into the old show, I liked the old movies, and most other shows, except whatever came after Voyager, including most episodes of Voyager). Trekmovie.com has new posters and crap for the new JJ Abrams movie [via Cinematical].
What I did was, I saw a midnight screening of the Dark Knight in Elizabeth, NJ. People who don't live in the ghetto and never will, sometimes refer to Elizabeth as the ghetto, and, while I get the reference, it's sort of a misnomer. When you live in the part of Jersey I do, you're pretty much outnumbered by "ghetto" areas anyway, so, my point is, the theater there is pretty good, but I had to argue to get that to be the first choice. The last movie I saw there was Iron Man, and the crowd was respectful except for one little kid. This time, the crowd was pretty much great.
At the end of the day: It's worth the money. The film is edited as a crowd pleaser--there are no fun character asides, not really. Everything that happens is relevant to the plot, whether you notice or not, and the action is great and seems necessary to what is happening in the world they have created (I might see this in IMAX as well, since much of the action was filmed that way). The movie is pretty violent, some of it implied, some it blowing up everywhere and getting shot out of nowhere (there is a scene involving a pencil that got the crowd in the mood, making it awesome). The acting works, especially you know who, and it ends on a note that I'm sure it would have whether Mr. Ledger was alive or not--you'll see, but (spoiler) I will say that I'm glad they chose to do it this way, but it makes me long even worse for what might have been, and also afraid of what Warner Brothers might try to do, especially if this movie makes money. Four Stars.
Because I am easily influenced, and if i read a bad review, I can't always assure myself that I won't let it affect my judgment. This is why I can't read Dark Knight anythings, because I have an active imagination, and it ruins my regular life; I can't let it ruin my artistic experiential life. I used to bury myself in reviews before seeing a movie, and I called it research, and, sometimes it helped, sometimes it hindered. At this point, I don't even ask my friends what they think of movies before I see them, because I have become one with my own opinion. Previously though, I was an opinion sponge. This also effects my regular life; the last movie I saw that suffered from this, though, was Transformers.
Inglorious Bastards, the new Quentin Tarantino production on which I have ruminated, has a script review that I'm not going to read, even though it's supposed to be positive. It's here.
The levels to which i am looking forward to the Dark Knight are sort of embarrassing. I don't think it's going to be the Best Movie Ever, or even the Best PG-13 Blockbuster Released in the Month of July Ever, but I've been looking forward to it since the joker card at the end of Batman Begins. I've been looking forward to it further ever since Heath Ledger was cast as the Joker. He has almost made me cry with his acting, so that makes him good (Brothers Grimm gets me every time jkjkjkjk).
Christian Bale was good in the Machinist (American Psycho was ok, the book was better) Morgan Freeman is boss hog, and Maggie G is good as well (I don't know shit about Eckhart, not from experience at least). Superhero sequels have a tendency to be pretty good, so i'm hoping.
I mean, i'm just looking to like it, the movie, just like the next fucker, so it can't let me down, because i don't have expectations of its quality, i just want to SEE IT. Okay, even that means there's an expectation on my part, but i tend not to read reviews for movies i plan on seeing, so when i see it, i hopefully won't know much about the consensus of its quality, so any bar set will be the one I've myself, which I can deal with. But i don't get genuinely geared up about a big budget movie, 'cept maybe once a year, (altho more than that this year) so we'll see how this ends up standing. I'm a fan of pretty much all involved, so I'm rooting for them to not waste my money.